Legally Bharat

Meesho closes $550 million round; moves NCLT to shift domicile, ET LegalWorld

Ecommerce firm Meesho has closed another $250-$270 million in financing with new investors Tiger Global, Think Investments, Mars Growth Capital joining an ongoing capital raise, taking the round’s total to about $550 million, majority of which is in secondary, people aware of the development told ET. The SoftBank- and Prosus-backed ecommerce firm has also filed […]

TBO Tek wins appeal against tax demand of ₹302 Million, Legal News, ET LegalWorld

Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal has allowed the TBO Tek’s appeal against the demand order passed by the Additional Director General, Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence. The demand was towards non-payment of the amount allegedly collected as representing Service Tax from the Sub-Agents for a demand amount of ₹ 302.02 […]

CCI imposes $25.4 million fine on Meta, Legal News, ET LegalWorld

India’s competition watchdog directed WhatsApp to refrain from sharing user data for advertising purposes with other applications owned by Meta for a period of five years and fined the US tech giant $25.4 million on Monday over antitrust violations related to the messaging application’s 2021 privacy policy. The Competition Commission of India (CCI) launched a […]

U.S. Court overturns $25 million arbitration award against former SEBI chairperson Meleveetil Damodaran, ET LegalWorld

A U.S. Court has overturned an arbitration award against Meleveetil Damodaran, former Chairperson of SEBI, which had previously found him liable for $25 million in damages to UpHealth Holdings Inc., a U.S.-based healthcare entity. The award was connected to a Share Purchase Agreement (SPA) involving UpHealth, Glocal Healthcare Systems Private Limited (India), and its shareholders, […]

Zydus Wellness faces ₹3.09 million tax demand for FY 2014-15, plans appeal, ET LegalWorld

Zydus Wellness Products Limited has received an Assessment Order from the Excise and Taxation Officer-cum-Notified Authority, U.T., Chandigarh, under Section 29(2) of The Punjab VAT Act, 2005, and The CST Act, 1956, alleging a demand of ₹0.31 million towards VAT (including a penalty of ₹0.16 million) and ₹2.78 million towards CST, aggregating to ₹3.09 million […]