Legally Bharat

Sebi plans hiking threshold to Rs 50,000 cr for making granular disclosures, ET LegalWorld

Sebi on Friday proposed doubling the threshold amount to Rs 50,000 crore for foreign portfolio investors to make granular disclosures about their investors holding any ownership or economic interest. At present, certain foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) with equity assets under management (AUM) exceeding Rs 25,000 crore are required to provide granular details of all their […]

Reliance Infrastructure faces ₹494 cr arbitral award; Plans appeal, ET LegalWorld

Reliance Infrastructure Limited has received an arbitral award passed by a arbitral tribunal in the matter of arbitration between Aravali Power Company Private Limited and RIL in relation to a EPC Contract on December 18, 2024. A three-member arbitral tribunal by a 2:1 majority held in favour of APCPL. The Award against the Company is […]

IBBI proposes mandatory monitoring committees for resolution plans, ET LegalWorld

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) has proposed monitoring committees for implementing resolution plans under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) rules. These changes seek to address challenges in implementing resolution plans and bolster confidence in the insolvency resolution process. The move came after a Supreme Court judgement emphasising statutory recognition for such […]

Can CoC liquidate before considering Resolution Plans? NCLAT rules, ET LegalWorld

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal has held that the legislative fiat of Section 33(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, read with the explanation clause, empowers the Committee of Creditors to decide to initiate liquidation even before inviting resolution plans i.e., the power given to the CoC to take decisions for liquidation is […]

Zydus Wellness faces ₹3.09 million tax demand for FY 2014-15, plans appeal, ET LegalWorld

Zydus Wellness Products Limited has received an Assessment Order from the Excise and Taxation Officer-cum-Notified Authority, U.T., Chandigarh, under Section 29(2) of The Punjab VAT Act, 2005, and The CST Act, 1956, alleging a demand of ₹0.31 million towards VAT (including a penalty of ₹0.16 million) and ₹2.78 million towards CST, aggregating to ₹3.09 million […]